5 Pieces of Evidence That Suggests Intelligent Alien Life Exists

Skeptics and believers are constantly combating each other as to whether or not there is intelligent life in the universe. Skeptics use lack of evidence as their main offensive and defensive weapon, but here I will submit to you 5 amazing pieces of evidence that suggests that intelligent extraterrestrial life exists.

1. UFOs In Ancient History

01

LINK

George Bernard Shaw once famously quipped, “We learn from history that we learn nothing from history”. This quote is fitting to this piece of evidence that suggests the UFO phenomenon has been around as long as human civilization has existed and yet it is consistently dismissed. Today many UFO sightings are often explained away as being the US military testing some new technological weapon or plane, but this explanation cannot be used in a time when human flight was impossible.

The painting above is titled “The Madonna with Saint Giovannino” and dates back to around the 15th century. The painting depicts the Virgin Mary in the foreground, and in the background is what appears to be a man looking up in awe at an object that is strikingly similar to our modern day perception of a UFO.

This is not the only example of UFOs in ancient art. There are literally hundreds of examples of objects in the sky in many paintings spanning across the centuries. Strangely, the majority of the paintings depict UFOS in connection with a spiritual figure or experience. This could be how the people of the period interpreted the things they were seeing or perhaps there is a literal connection between the spiritual and UFOs.

Erich von Däniken, author of the famous and controversial Chariots of The Gods, suggests that our gods and angles maybe intelligent aliens. In the Old Testament, The Book of Ezekiel discusses an encounter with a strange flying object made of metal that took the shape of a wheel. Inside were four living creatures that looked like humans. Many people believe the Bible to be the literal word of God; it should be especially hard for those people to ignore this evidence. It is the Gospel after all.

Many may have a hard time taking the theories of Däniken seriously, but even respected astrophysicist Carl Sagan believed that we should seriously consider the possibility that extraterrestrial contact occurred in the past, so we should not completely dismiss this idea.

2. Astronauts have seen UFOs

02

LINK

Three days into the Apollo 11 flight the astronauts on board sent a strange message to mission control asking, “Do you have any idea where the S-4B is with respect to us?” The astronauts were asking where the final stage of the rocket was, which had been detached two days prior. The reason for this inquiry was because something was riding along side of the rocket and if it wasn’t part of the rocket, Apollo 11 had a visitor.

The crew on board did not want to make a big deal out of the object for fear that it would cause a panic and mission control would order the astronauts to abandon the mission. “The three of us were not going to blurt out, ‘hey Houston we got something moving along side of us and we don’t know what it is’ we weren’t about to do that…someone might of demanded we turn back because of aliens or whatever it is,” said astronaut Buzz Aldrin when discussing the situation at a later date.

Mission control did answer the astronaut’s cryptic question about the location of the S-4b unit. The unit was 6,000 miles from their location. What Aldrin and the other three astronauts were looking at was an Unidentified Flying Object exhibiting an intelligent flight path. In fact, according to Dr. David Baker, an Apollo 11 Senior Scientist, astronauts seeing UFOs is not uncommon and dates back to the early earth orbit space flights.

If your friend who works at the video store claims to have seen a sea monster, his story has very little credibility. If an experienced Naval Captain claims to have seen a sea monster then his sighting has tremendous credibility. If experienced and respected astronauts are seeing evidence of intelligent life outside of Earth it should also be taken very seriously.

3. The Wow Signal

03

LINK

In 1977, at Ohio Sate University, The Big Ear radio telescope picked up an unusual signal. Big Ear used numbers and letters to determine the strength of a signal, 0 being meaningless noise and Z being a strong radio signal. An astronomer, Dr. Jerry R. Ehman, studying the data from the telescope was shocked when a radio signal clocking in at ‘6EQUJ5’ came from a seemingly empty spot in space. Ehman was so shocked that he circled the signal on the data sheet and simply wrote ‘Wow’.

The transmission lasted 37 seconds and came from the Sagittarius constellation. Even more interesting is the fact that the nearest star in that specific direction is 220 million light years away. In other words, the signal came from an empty spot in space. It is also interesting to note that the signal had all the characteristics of an interstellar broadcast.

Some have tried to explain that the signal is somehow of an Earthly origin, but this seems unlikely as the signal was in a frequency that is internationally banned on Earth. The conclusion that has the most evidence going for it is that it is of an extraterrestrial origin, and because there are no stars near where the signal was found one can conclude that it came from a spacecraft manned by intelligent entities.

4. The Drake Equation

04

LINK

N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
ƒp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
ƒℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
ƒc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space.

Radio astronomer Frank Drake developed the Drake equation so he could estimate the number of planets harboring intelligent life in the galaxy by taking into consideration the factors listed above. A rigorous estimate using the Drake Equation was implemented in 2001, which also took into consideration the number of planets that are in the habitable zone (The habitable zone is an area around a star were water is in liquid form, temperature is ideal, and photosynthesis is possible). The results found that hundreds of thousands of life-bearing planets statistically should exist. It also suggested that a habitable planet like the Earth should exist just a few hundred light years away.

I find it unfair if I did not now also give equal mention to the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox states that if so many planets exist with intelligent life why is there a lack of contact between the intelligent life and us and why is there such a lack of physical evidence of said intelligent life. The paradox exists in that the Drake equation statistically proves life should be abundant and yet physical evidence says otherwise. It is hard to combat the arguments from the Fermi paradox except that some physical evidence does exist as you can see from this writing.

5. SETI Radio Signal February 2003

05

LINK

In 2003, astronomers with the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) used a massive telescope to examine sections of the sky where they had previously found unexplained radio signals. They found another radio signal that was even stronger than what they had previously found.

The signal came from an area in space where there are no planets or stars and strangely was at a frequency that hydrogen absorbs, ensuring that the signal would be strong and could travel great distances. The signal was detected on three separate occasions.

“The signal is moving rapidly in frequency and you would expect that to happen if you are looking at a transmitter on a planet that’s rotating very rapidly and where the civilization is not correcting the transmission for the motion of the planet,” Says USB researcher Eric Korpela. Considering the signal operates as if it is intelligently operated and the fact that it was detected multiple times one has to consider this SETI signal the best candidate for proof of intelligent life on other planets.

Author: Jonathan Kaulay Copyrighted © paranormalhaze.com

  • kevin ferguson
    You might want to reread ezekiel.
  • ACT
    The writer of this article may not no what they're talking about, considering they can't even spell. "suggests that our gods and angles maybe intelligent aliens" should be suggests that our gods and angels may be intelligent aliens, so how do we know this is someone trustworthy?
  • I'm sorry that you dislike free speech and the truth so much.  Yet you allow, people like Big T to use multiple accounts, spam the site, and lie constantly.  But maybe truth and being straightforward is too much for you to accept?  I expected more courage and ethical behavior from you.
  • Guest
    You keep repeating that what you say is the truth but have no evidence for that. You are justifying the "truth" by opinion which is a circular argument. I suggest you broaden your mind and study the philosophy of debate if you want to be taken seriously.
  • If what I say is not true, why hasn't anyone come forth with proof that it is not?  Exactly what do you think I have said is not true?  Where is your proof?  What would you like me to prove?  

    You are making broad accusations without attempting to substantiate them in the least.

    I recommend you follow your own advice.  You clearly don;t have the faintest idea of what you're talking about.
  • vedrisha
    you have been blocked because you are not treating people right. I'm aware that for last year you are always in some kind of arguing with other readers. Sorry but no one gives a crap what you have to say or what you think.  Big T is not your consideration than mine. btw, he's been put in Spam as well. And please for your own good don't be so grumpy. People don't like it...
  • What makes you think I care about someone like you that approves of spam but dislikes free speech and telling the truth.  If you want, you might note that not one person has ever tried to disprove anything I have said.  True, some don't like it.  People often dislike the truth and those that tell it, especially when it dispels their favored delusions.  That is not the problem of those that state the facts but of those that prefer their delusions.  

     Your action says far more about your own failings than anything else and none of what it says is good. If you had any ethics at all, you would unblock me and block Big T. Because any display of real ethics on you part would be a total surprise to me, you can do the next best thing. Remove all of my posts and any evidence that I was ever foolish enough to waste my time on a site run by such an unreasonable person.
  • I had hoped that the site administrators would be fair-minded people that appreciated free speech and truth.  I see I was mistaken about that.  How sad.
  • I am blocked from this site?  I have done nothing but tell the truth.  Big T, for example, has repeatedly posted spam in the last 24 hours.  Apparently the site administration is as afraid of free speech and truth, too.

    Well, the entire premise here is the work of conspiracy theorists so nothing intelligent was expected.  Cowardly, unfair behavior was expected.  I have not been disappointed in that.  

    I had received far more likes than I had comments so that's an indication of how I stand with many people.
  • I am blocked from this site?  I have done nothing but tell the truth.  Big T has posted cut and paste spam frequently in the las 24 hours.  The site administrators must be terribly afraid of truth and free speech.
  • vedrisha
    I'm the owner of Paranormal Haze and I have banned James Smith. He was to big asshole for last year. I hope that non of you will take it personal, but he really overdo. If anyone insist I can  unban him.
  • Guest
    If we were ever contacted by aliens, I sure hope James Smith isn't the first person they communicate with or we may have a mass alien suicide on our hands. Such a poor example of an "intellectual" human being, I weep for humanity reading posts like his. It's OK James, you keep posting pointless comments asserting your "intellect" (arrogance), no one really cares. Delusions of grandeur. If creating arguments with random people on the internet makes you happy, then go for it, but I can see a lonely existence for you, but judging by the size of your ego, I'm sure that can keep you company.
  • Everyone should note that "guest" has not the courage to post even under an alias.  It's pretty difficult to take seriously someone that can't even be bothered to sign in to a site where he expects to make general pronouncements he expects everyone to believe.
  • Guest
    James, are you mentally ill?
  • No, and I am not someone that can't be bothered to even register at a site.  But maybe you prefer to hide behind "guest" so your silly statements can never directly attributed to you?

  • Ryan Amal447
    the universe is huge, there are a numerous planets, why would our planet the only one with life?  i believe aliens do exist, it will be proved one day.............
  • I agree.  The universe is so vast that it is at least a statistical probability that intelligent life exists somewhere besides our planet.  But it is also so vast that it is possible none of us will ever notice the others.  Or maybe we couldn't recognize each other as life, much less intelligent life.  

    But, on the cosmic scale, humans haven't really been here for long so we have lots of time, yet.  :D
  • Smarter than you
    James, Erik, Harry, Frank and everyone else commenting on commenting... you are all a bunch of douche bags (except for me). You're all dumb. And I am smart. But I don't have to tell you Im smart becaseu I am smart. You dumb douches.

    Any negative replies to this comment means you are stupid and gay.
  • Ooh, how intelligent and accurate.  I mean, ignorant and juvenile.
  • Anonymous
    Yup. It is certain intelligent life exists outside of earth and is likely very common throughout the universe. However earth is not one of the place where intelligent life exists. Earth has life but none of it is intelligent.
  • mark
    Proof? Proof that something is so and that means that something else is not so. The easiest thing to prove that it is not is religion. Human intellect seems to avoid the obvious.Various species evolve and come into existence to fill any gap. Why does anyone think this stops at the edge of our atmosphere? In our ecosystem we have wonderful things like bedbugs, roaches and mosquitos. Can anyone honestly say these were part of a plan?
  • J.Dub
    Also I find it more difficult to explain the united states space craft thinger. The painting could probably be a practical joke by the artist or more likely a mistake of god reference.
  • J.Dub
    Ignoring the previous comments due to people being retards. I can explain the SETI signal as well as the WOW signal. Assuming that light travels at a speed considerably faster than radio waves, it would bebsafe to say that the origin of the signals is not intelligent craft, but a star that was at the origin many billions of years ago that has supernovad and the light past us already, what we are getting now are radiation of some sort that is similar to radio waves. You may claim "radiation and radio waves are different and would be picked up on a Geiger counter not a radio telescope how ever interference from other suns planets or black holes (assuming they are real, there us yet to be conclusive evidence of that too) or more likely a coincidence or random event from farther in the milky way.
  • jo momma
    yes that is true. they have considered it. but the way it repeated it self every now and then as if a message  suggests that it is a radio frequency. say i say a sentence like this one: jack just jacked jack's food.
    i repeated my self more than once witch is what happened on the radio frequency.
  • anonymous
    ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!
    they can hear and see what your visually thinking

    the reason alot of asians have completely expressionless faces, only associate with asians and dont associate with non asians very much is to avoid accidentally revealing that they can read read minds, if all over a billion asians were to show facial expressions all the time just as much as non asians, associate with non asians much more, and be much more friendly and talkative, then alot of them might accidentally reveal that they can read minds by accidentally showing a facial expression or dirty look when someone thinks, or visually pictures something in their mind they dont like or find astonishing or funny, and if they were all to associate with non asians alot more there would be alot more people around for them to accidentally show facial expressions when those other people think things they dont like, so they only associate with asians so there wont be anyone around for them to see that and have any accidents happen in the first place

    think about it, its  not normal how alot of them act, and the entire way they act is all to hide their mind reading abilities, it makes perfect sense to do all of that to hide that they can read minds, because all of that is the perfect way to do it!
    every single asian on the planet is hiding their mind reading abilities, they value hiding their mind reading abilities more then their own lives!
    thats why nobody knows about it!

    try thinking, best yet visually picturing in your mind something something absolutely crazy as you possibly can when you are around asians, and try looking for asians who give people particular looks, especially dirty looks for what appears to be for completely no reason, that is them giving people looks when they hear and visually see someone thinking something they dont like, find funny or astonishing
    it still happens despite a large number of them having completely expressionless faces all the time, it would just happen alot more if none of htem had completely expressionless faces all the time, its not uncommon!

    i know this sounds crazy, impossible, and completely unbelievable, BUT IT ISNT CRAZY WHEN ITS TRUE

    you have to spread the message!!!
    the world has to know about this!!!!

  • guest
    you're a retard..
  • Zebdabar
    hey did you guys read about the SETI signal ?
  • Ginadinardo
    how can i raise my daughter to understand the universe and introduce her to space, physics etc.
  • Illegal Aliens
    Teach her the basics and let her mind create the rest, have her believe what she wants to believe because if you do not you will not find happiness. or put her in a rocket with a destination of mars.
  • Jamesminniss
    Why do intelligent lifeforms need to travel in machines and craft we mimic, and conceive are like our own ideas and designs.
    And these lifeforms would be able to observe us, by much greater distances than we need to observe say Mars.
    Why don't you UFO people construct some other from of belief system and fit your ideas into that?
    The book of Ezekiel in the OT talks of a Supernatural being that didn't need a device to fly around in as the Vondaniken people suggested.....gobbldy gook people! As dogmatic as a man Worshipping a rock!
  • ImNotSaying
    Or a worshipping a god that never shows him or her self.
  • Ixu
    There is an internationally banned frequency?
  • ImNotSaying
    Yaaa,,that sounded a little too convenient to me too.
  • Sallehawang
    They will not come until they can solve this formula ( 1+ 0 = ?) x ( 1+1= love)+ (1+ 2 = 0)
  • ImNotSaying
    The answer is 42! What do I win?
  • Horatio
    No. 1: It's a religious painting and the object is most likely supposed to be the artists interpretation of a heavenly vessel or being. It's only a UFO in that we can't identify it and it appears to be flying. To try to use this painting as evidence that aliens exist/have visited earch is ridiculous.
  • ImNotSaying
    I kinda have to agree with Horatio on this. What if it was just the artist's concept of an angel riding a shiny cloud or something. Maybe his wasn't the great of an artist and it was a stain left by his coffee cup. LOL
  • Jon
    So your problem with it is that it's a religious-themed painting...if it was any other type of painting you'd have no problem with it. Typical close-mindedness.
  • No, you've misunderstood him. He's saying that as it's a religious painting, the object depicted may not be intended to be interpreted literally. It could be the artists impression of a heavenly vessel or some other metaphor. He's not saying disregard it because it's religious, only that it being religious leaves it open to interpretations that wouldn't be valid if it were an impressionist work.
  • Notdatty
    Let me see, the nearest galaxy to us that can supposedly support life is something like 100 light years away and they are soooo intelligent that they have found our planet and a way to travel to our planet (At the speed of light? 186000 miles a second or 700 million miles an hour.)

    Yet, when they finally get to our planet..... THEY HIDE !

    Then they only come out at night and do hideous experiments on unsuspecting humans and animals. And you call that Intelligent ?
  • jo momma
    first of all the closest planet habitable is 17 light years away. and it is impossible to go the speed of light and live unless you are not a physical thing. and if they are here they would not do hideous experiments on us at night. they would simply observe us like we do animals or, if we are not so lucky, they will kill us off and use our resources.
  • Yes and no. They certainly could be here, hiding, observing us, but I seriously doubt they're doing experiments at night.
  • ImNotSaying
    Maybe cuz they see us humans as nothing but crazy assed apes with guns. Would you stop at the zoo to make small talk with a chimp bent on killing everything it doesn't understand? Probably not.
  • Weez
    A simple analogy based on an universe infinite in size, which is theoretically possible:
    If I have an infinite amount of playing cards, and I ask you to draw all four aces, and give you infinite opportunities; it's bound to happen.
  • Soendoro Soetanto
    I don't think there is alien.

    Soendoro Soetanto
  • Sid
    the boyz were in a hollywood studio when the so called moon debacle shiite happened
    ps in 40 yrs no one wants to plan another moon mission puhleez!!
  • Matthew Kestner
    and with the powerful telescopes we have on earth as well as the satellites circling the planet why can no one produce a clear picture of the objects left on the surface of the moon...the lander, the equipment etc.
  • guest
    For one thing these powerful telescopes were designed to look at distant objects that we can't normally we see. Additionally, there are plenty of pictures of stuff left behind, do just a little bit of research and you'll find it.
  • Me-Mo
    Why would an intelligent alien race let us know they are out there?Humans can't even get along with other humans.We have been at war,and killing each other since before recorded history.If you see a pile of dog crap,the intelligent step over it.Not into it.
  • Vic
    No, James_smith is saying he's a dick who feels it's his right as an internt troll to have a go at whoever he sees fit.
  • bluebury
    okay to end all the grammar fighting. maybe buzz actually said might of. if you want to have the exact words you put the exact words. aint aint in the dictionary but we use it all the time
  • Yes, but no one says "Might of" they just don't think about what they're saying, and then when it comes to write it down, "might've" sounds like "might of" and if they're stupid they don't know any better.
  • SJ Mack
    Excuse me, but just because someone has written down "Might Of" instead of "Might Have" does not make them stupid. I've done it before and I am pretty smart. It's just mostly habit of saying "Might Of" that will cause people to write it as such.
  • Beardfaceman
    think about this from the aliens point of view, would you visit this planet?
  • Tedy4926
    Hell no, we are nothing but a source of Bull Shit, and a bunch of Whore or War moungers.
  • Dave26027
    Wouldn't it be funny if aliens read this post and commented on it?
  • Tlpopejoy
    People are always asking if there is intellegent life forms in the univers why haven't he heard from them, why don't they interact with us? I ask why would they? Even in our own fiction the "advanced civilization" often times have a code of non interaction with intellegent species unless the've already acheived a certin level of technology. Even if no such code exist, what would we have to offer them? Our technology would be primitive by comparrision, we give away our cultrue via video and audio transmissions, there would be trillions of uninhabited planets and spacial bodies to harvest resources from, and if they came here for sicentific resarch, the could easly swoop down, take a biological sample and fly off before anyone could but half notice it. Furthermore unless they made a mass anoucement to the whole planet any interaction eiter accidental or intential, would almost certinally be covered up by the government of that region, or the handfull of indiviuals they chose to visit would be ridiculed as frauds becaus the aliens have not made a mass anoucement. Just because we don't have undisputable evidence does not mean it does not exist, it just means we have no undisputable evidence to say yes or no.
  • Darkknightbob
    That signal was actually a pulsar emitting a constant gamma ray source.

    his article really just shows an amateur level of understanding over the issues.
  • Illegal Aliens
    im pretty sure that a renowned xenobiologist working for SETI has a higher leve of understanding than he is being credited for
  • AWESOME_0Possum
    I think you are correct that it is now believed that a pulsar for the wow signal, but the SETI one dissappeared after they recorded it a few times so it being a constant pulsar seems unlikely.
  • JRBeaman
    I like Jody Fosters statement in the movie "Contact":
    Paraphrasing...
    If there are no intelligent life forms out there besides us, it's a terrible waste of space."

    The Drake Equation is valuable only in that it indicates the issues and factors that need to be considered in realizing the probability. You can play with the numbers, but you will always come up with a significant value, and that is the whole point of the equation, not to get a specific number. To not realize that means you are not part of the scientific community and don't understand how to think in scientific terms.
  • Tlpopejoy
    THANK YOU, what a well put and poient statement.
  • vernon marsh
    I'm quite willing to believe there is intelligent life elsewhere in the U but this stuff is pretty weak.
  • unbound
    Wow...way to cherry-pick information and eliminate all context. The Drake Equation has long-ago been shown to be nonsense...about 1/2 the variables are guesses he pulled out of thin air.

  • jo momma
    the drake equation has nothing to with guesses, it is about the equation, not the numbers, you can always change those. the equation will always be correct because the numbers in it can be changed.
  • Well, he didn't exactly pull them out of thin air, as he did use some statistical modeling based on input from scientists in a variety of fields to try to make some reasonable assumptions. He also noted that given a huge gap in information, those assumptions might turn out to be utterly wrong.

    The Drake Equation most certainly has NOT "been shown to be nonsense." If anything, it has been *slightly* strengthened in that when he first came up with it, a whole lot of people felt our solar system might turn out to be the only one at all anywhere in the entire universe -- but with a list of discovered exoplanets numbering over 400 and growing, we now know stars with planets do exists. Now, that doesn't improve what we might say about the possibility of (1.) Earth-like planets elsewhere, nor (2.) such planets' orbits being in the Goldilocks Zone (the habitable zone), nor (3.) the likelihood of *any* life arising on said planets, nor (4.) *intelligent* life particularly.

    But that's only to be expected. After all, we've had only a limited number of flybys of planets and other objects in our *own* solar system, and landings (in which the craft survived, I mean) on far fewer. And we've had men on only our own Moon. In other words, we have only a tiny set of data points.

    I personally am inclined to believe there's some possibility, perhaps even probability, that some form of intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe. I base that in part on the sheer size of the cosmos. BUT -- if said life is, say, at the level of first humans, we probably couldn't communicate with them, assuming we could physically reach them. (They obviously wouldn't have TV, radio, etc., so astronauts would have to literally stumble upon them.) On the other hand, if they were far more advanced than us, the same might apply. That narrows the possibilities, since we would have to be near enough in our level of development to even recognize each other as intelligent (probably).

    It's interesting to recall that even the Condon Committee, set up about 40 years ago with the specific goal -- and assignment from the US government -- to debunk the very idea of UFO's was unable to do so. Out of the thousands of incidents they investigated, there was a residue they admitted left them stumped. They did put a face on it by adding that their failure to be able to explain (or, in the eyes of critics, "explain *away*") some hundreds of cases was probably due to a lack of knowledge, technology, etc. on their part.

    I personally have had professional pilots, both military and commercial, tell me they've seen something they couldn't identify. In some, but not all, of those cases, they added the aircraft they didn't recognize behaved in ways different from, superior to, or both compared to any aircraft with which they were familiar. ALL of them did make it a point to specifically add that none of that meant little green men from Planet X were at the controls. After all, when we, the general public, begin to get the first inklings of some new super-duper aircraft of spaceship, it's widely believed that the Air Force, NASA, etc. are somewhere in the range of five generations beyond that in their research and development. For instance, when the SR-71 "Blackbird" first became public knowledge, Skunk Works was already years ahead looking at stealth technology, which most people didn't even realize was possible. (Skunk Works, now a division of Boeing, developed the SR-71.)

    It's an interesting question, and barring a Klingon fleet coming out of warp space sometime soon, I likely won't live to see the answer!
  • Tlpopejoy
    Just because he pulled the variables out of thin air does it make it any less valid? The equation is based on his criteria for intellegent life based on the data avalible at the time he formed it. Without have an accurate sampeling of at least a galixy, then there is no way to be certin what is an accurate formula. So cut the man a little slack, or even better creat a new one with more solid proof.
  • Bob
    Given the same logic. unicorns must truly exist since they appear far more ancient paintings. The drake equation has NOTHING to do with being visited by aliens. An equation can tell you that out of all the grains of sand on a beach 100 are purple. It does not tell you there likelihood of being together.

    This extremely weak collection of 'evidence' over the entire lifetime of our planet is in fact lends far greater weight to the argument that we have NOT been visited by UFOs. Falling rocks have left far more evidence that these 'intelligent' life forms.
  • Bob Jean Ray
    IDIOT , the topic is not whether we have been 'visited' or not but whether 'alien life exists' or not. And you want people to believe to the shit that in this sea beach of a universe where earth doesnt even count like a piece of sand, we are the only planet with evolved life. Yeah Right! Asshole
  • The UFO crazies are a lot like theists. Anything they don't understand automatically becomes a god/ufo event. I am disgusted with the lack of rational thought from both groups.
  • noone important
    mostly anyone that believes in god will make it into a god event as you put it but anyone who dosnt believe in god makes it into a ufo event
  • It's not irrational to see a designer of things with order. After all, we expend so much intellect trying to grasp what we see already; how much more intellect and conscious thought processes would be necessary to conceive such things, not to mention the construction of such? To think that flashes in the pan like us are even remotely capable of understanding these things with any measure of awareness is childishness.

    (Ecclesiastes 3:11) . . .Everything he has made pretty in its time. Even time indefinite he has put in their heart, that mankind may never find out the work that the true God has made from the start to the finish. . .
  • It is irrational when there is no evidence for that designer. Then it just becomes trying to attribute that which you don't understand to a belief that is already firmly entrenched in your mind.
  • Clap
    Am I really the first person to ask for sources?
  • Tlpopejoy
    The article is only to plant an idea in your mind, if your mind is inquisitive enough, if you find the argument compelling enough there is enough information in the article for you to find colabrating or denying soruces through your own resarch.
  • Probably not, but you won't get any either. UFO nuts, like theists, ignore questions they cannot answer.
  • janinec
    Probably not, but you won't get any either. UFO nuts, like theists, ignore questions they cannot answer.??? you yourself have ignored questions,is this because you cant answer them or simply because your head is stuck too far up your arse
  • Tell me, exactly what questions have I ignored?  You are a liar and a fool.  

    I can answer any question a moron like you can ask.
  • Stanton2beast92
    here's a question bro.... What does a vagina feel like? now nobody tell james and give it away
  • That's exactly the immature, ignorant sexually slanted comment I expect from a hopeless moron like you.  Come on down, lets see who is a man and who is a cowardly little boy.

    We both know you are only talking big.  You have no intention of ever facing me personally.  Everyone reading this can see I put my money and my skin on the line, you do nothing, you pathetic punk.
  • Stanton2beast
    Haha the 70 year old virgin is mad
  • Santosh G Bhat (MIT)
    If your friend who works at the video store claims to have seen a sea monster, his story has very little credibility. If an experienced Naval Captain claims to have seen a sea monster then his sighting has tremendous credibility. If experienced and respected astronauts are seeing evidence of intelligent life outside of Earth it should also be taken very seriously.

    Even more interesting is the fact that the nearest star in that specific direction is 220 million light years away. In other words, the signal came from an empty spot in space. It is also interesting to note that the signal had all the characteristics of an interstellar broadcast. Some have tried to explain that the signal is somehow of an Earthly origin, but this seems unlikely as the signal was in a frequency that is internationally banned on Earth. The conclusion that has the most evidence going for it is that it is of an extraterrestrial origin, and because there are no stars near where the signal was found one can conclude that it came from a spacecraft manned by intelligent entities.

    If so many planets exist with intelligent life why is there a lack of contact between the intelligent life and us and why is there such a lack of physical evidence of said intelligent life. The paradox exists in that the Drake equation statistically proves life should be abundant and yet physical evidence says otherwise. It is hard to combat the arguments from the Fermi paradox except that some physical evidence does exist as you can see from this writing.
  • TheLastOne
    Actually there is a perfectly sound reason that we have not been contacted, signals degrade over distance, in fact in order to get a detectable signal to the closest star to us would require a transmitter over 150 time more powerful than any we currently have available to us, so it does make sense and there is no paradox.
  • Poop
    Buzz Aldrin did not say "…someone might of demanded we turn back because of aliens or whatever it is...” because the phrase is gibberish. The phrase is "might have", often contracted to "might've" and then bastardized into "might of" by people typing what they think they hear without realizing it makes no sense.
  • Riddler
    The Best part of all of this is "might of" is a pretty common speech mistake, especially in the midwest and south. It is similar to "ain't" and calling all carbonated sodas "Coke". Would you say Elvis never wrote "You ain't nothing but a hound dog" because that sentence is grammatically disgusting?
  • Matthew Kestner
    You're implying that he didn't say it simply because it's grammatically incorrect? Do you know him personally? Have you asked him about the incident? If you answered no to both of those questions then please shut your well educated but incredibly ignorant mouth.
  • kort
    I can't believe you guys have been arguing about grammar on a comments page for UFO's....
    Please, I beg of you, get a life :)

    Redundancy....
  • Matthew Kestner
    you're absolutely right. got carried away responding to an idiot. thank you for bringing me back to me senses. I firmly believe there is other intelligent life in the universe besides us. :p
  • Tlpopejoy
    Natural speach is not always gramatically correct, nor does it alwys follow established norms. IF the post is quoting a direct statement, then it all the more validates the post.
  • vesey
    Geez Poop here i was getting all excited about aliens really existing and you just lacerated the mood.....bad form............................
  • Rachel
    Thank you internet grammar nazi.
  • phoenix219
    not to defend the grammar nazi's, but these are horribly written articles - theres no intelligent journalism or news left on the internet  Add to the list of errors: "suggests that our gods and angles maybe intelligent aliens."   thats two right there "angels may be intelligent aliens" ....
  • Illegal Aliens
    I didn't fucking make an account on this website so I could listen to a bunch of panzys who have nothing better to do with their lifes except bicker back and forth like little girls, so either shut the fuck up or talk about what this website was made for.
  • Guest
    I don't agree with what you're saying but, since you're defending grammar nazis, I must point out that a plural doesn't need an apostrophe and a contraction does. Therefore, nazis does not need an apostrophe, but that's and there's does. This is an interesting article, by the way, and sullied by irrelevant comments afterwards.
  • I agree with what you say, even if you have left out apostrophes.
  • Ben
    you got owned by letting off steam and then you said go fuck yourself lol with no real response! you got beat up in high school and then thought you were tough online and had high school flash backs, he whooped your ass And that's the problem with society no one admits there wrong or takes responsibly. just own up to the ass whoppin you took.
  • Wow, you reveal a lot of ignorance in one post.  You know not one thing about me, but you make uninformed, ignorant statements anyway.  

    I did not get beat up in high school.  As for ass whooping, that's what you deserve for being such a totally ignorant piece of shit.  

    Own up to your own actions, and I will pay your way from wherever you are to where I am and them we'll see how brave you are when not hiding behind your keyboard.  Oh., and fuck you, too.
  • A Christian
    Don't worry everyone, he does this on every site he is on.  Jesus loves you Jimmy it's not too late to repent.
  • You can't resist following me can you?  Everyone should know that  "A Christian" is no christian but a liar and a coward.  He first said he was in Canada, then he said he was in China, next he said Okinawa.  He is a disgrace to all sincere christians.  

    I offered to fly him to where I am.  The asked him for proof of anything, his name, location, anything he has ever said, and guess what?  He hasn't answered a single question.

    FYI, you craven punk, there is no jesus, and the only thing I have to repent is that I haven't been able to meet you.  Then I would qualify for the "Hero of Humanity" award for raising the average IQ and intellectual level of the human race.  Guess how easy it would be for me to do that?  One hand and you would be history.
  • Guest
    You must have a very small penis.
blog comments powered by Disqus